07-17-2016 | #71 | |||||||||||
Chymist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 392
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
It's not necessarily wrong to be uncertain about something, but ideas about the unreliability of means of acquiring knowledge can be taken too far. Other considerations should be brought to bear, but not independently of the context of a system that affects qualities of experience. Human actions do not happen in isolation from human psychologies and their future impact on the world. Recreationally mutilating a dead body, for example, would be bad because it's an action that requires a harmful type of psychology. And it would be predictive that the person could find it psychologically acceptable to commit acts in the future that cause experiential harms. My ethics are ultimately consequentialist, but I don't limit the category of consequences to being so immediate as to eliminate the importance of people following principles that don't necessarily cause experiential harm in every instance, because having rules that are consistently followed is often consequentially an overall good. Yes, I agree with that. But I would add that harms to the unconscious mind are harms because they have an impact on consciously experienced harms in the future. I agree that consent is important, but only in a context of experiential harms. I'm assuming the entire human race would go into VR at the same time. Also, the human race going into VR would prevent all the non-consensual acts that would otherwise cause real experienced harm, while the "wrong" of the human race going into VR would be a concept which no one would believe, since they wouldn't know they had gone into VR. If someone was in VR and it was certain they would never leave VR, there could be a belief in ethics, but the ethics wouldn't really matter. Playing violent video games can only be bad if it negatively affects a person's psychology and manifests as behavior impacting real people or animals. There has to be harms or potential harms for ethics to have a real purpose, and it would be wrong to ensure that there would be risks of real harm just so people could act ethically to stop the harm. That would be making the problem in order to fix it. Some people use "rational action" to refer to someone's acting in their own self-interest. If an action can be called rational in respect to one's own interests, an action's impact on the interests of others should factor in determining if it's rational. It does depend on how particular conclusions relate or don't relate to larger views. | |||||||||||
Last edited by Gray House; 07-18-2016 at 12:29 AM.. Reason: edited so that I don't appear anti-autopsy |
||||||||||||
2 Thanks From: | gveranon (07-17-2016), miguel1984 (07-18-2016) |
07-18-2016 | #72 | |||||||||||
Chymist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 392
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
Not the best example. To be clear, I'm not anti-autopsy. | |||||||||||
07-18-2016 | #73 | |||||||||||
Grimscribe
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 609
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
Good. Thank you. I have no ideas about the unreliability of means of acquiring knowledge, but i keep an open mind as to the possibility of there being knowledge outside the purview of the available means. This, as a qualification of the knowledge, not of the means. The fish is not unreliable for not being able to breathe on land, or not being able to walk. The environment simply excludes any abilities of the fish from being applied to navigating said environment. | |||||||||||
"What can a thing do with a thing, when it is a thing?"
-Shaykh Ibn 'Arabi Last edited by Ibrahim; 07-18-2016 at 06:41 PM.. |
||||||||||||
07-18-2016 | #74 | |||||||||||
Grimscribe
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,307
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
It's unlikely that the entire human race would go into VR at the same time. New technologies are always adopted gradually. Early, crude VR is already being used here and there. Also, as with other technologies, VR will be used for the usual aims, money and power. If VR can be used to exploit others for these ends, it will be. Harm-based ethics, if it becomes influential, could help to provide cover for this exploitation ("Hey, no one was harmed!"). Your points about indirect harm would be lost; humans are good at ignoring indirect harms, and have to be in order for ordinary life to continue (a reason for pessimism, yes). But you assume that the whole human race will enter VR at the same time. For you, this dispenses with the problem of consent, as long as no harm is experienced. Individuals can be destroyed, as long as no harm is experienced. Again, my suspicion that harm-centered ethics can be misused in monstrous ways is confirmed. Good point about ethics needing to have a purpose, which it presumably wouldn't in VR. No, I don't think it would be good to make problems in order to have problems to fix. But the loss of legitimate ethical thinking in VR would mean that the VR setup itself could not be challenged from within the VR setup. That's beyond Orwellian or Huxleyan or Foucauldian, into a type of total control that doesn't yet have a name, as far as I know. But a name won't be needed if the entire human race is in VR! But the "rational" self-interest of an individual and the interests of others are often in conflict. And, at least in most situations, it is impossible to determine the interest of the whole, because individuals within the whole want and need different things. Your ethics tends in the direction of a ruthless collectivism, which, I suppose, is appropriate: Extinction is collective by definition (though nothingness isn't). | |||||||||||
2 Thanks From: | miguel1984 (07-18-2016), With Strength I Burn (07-18-2016) |
07-18-2016 | #75 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quotes:
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
The music of Kanye West has kept me going today. People tend to think I'm joking with my Kanye love, but I honestly think he'll be looked back on as among the only pop music figures of this age who was doing anything remotely interesting. He has a terrible ego, but so did Poe and Aickman.
If Poe had Twitter, he'd be scrapping with everybody. |
2 Thanks From: | miguel1984 (07-18-2016), Nirvana In Karma (07-18-2016) |
07-18-2016 | #76 |
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quotes:
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
|
Thanks From: | miguel1984 (07-19-2016) |
07-19-2016 | #77 | |||||||||||
Chymist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 392
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
Their reasons for wanting what they want and the costs in harms can be compared. | |||||||||||
07-19-2016 | #78 | |||||||||||
Grimscribe
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 609
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
Apples 'n oranges. | |||||||||||
"What can a thing do with a thing, when it is a thing?"
-Shaykh Ibn 'Arabi |
||||||||||||
07-19-2016 | #79 | |||||||||||
Chymist
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 392
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
Moral nihilism/subjectivism is too stupid. | |||||||||||
2 Thanks From: | miguel1984 (07-19-2016), With Strength I Burn (07-19-2016) |
07-19-2016 | #80 | |||||||||||
Grimscribe
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,541
Quotes: 0
|
Re: Pessimists - What Keeps You Going?
I recently saw a Romesh Ranganathan interview in which he said he's a fan but wanted to kill Kanye (in answer to a joke question about "which celebrity would you kill?") for having a show where an alien voice tells him that he's the brightest star in the universe. Kanye West created a show where an alien tells him that he's the brightest star in the universe. | |||||||||||
My gallery...
http://robertadamgilmour.blogspot.com |
||||||||||||
3 Thanks From: |
Bookmarks |
Tags |
pessimists |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Female pessimists? | actualwolf | CATHR Online Comments | 49 | 01-30-2021 01:25 AM |
Good advice for Pessimists and Antinatalists | Malone | Personal | 4 | 07-20-2016 10:50 AM |
Ligotti about pessimists in CATHR | Matthias M. | General Discussion | 2 | 08-18-2015 05:47 AM |