THE NIGHTMARE NETWORK
Go Back   THE NIGHTMARE NETWORK > Discussion & Interpretation > Other Authors
Home Forums Content Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Contagion Members Media Diversion Info Register
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes Translate
Old 1 Week Ago   #81
Sand's Avatar
Sand
Mystic
Threadstarter
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 210
Quotes: 0
Points: 10,557, Level: 71 Points: 10,557, Level: 71 Points: 10,557, Level: 71
Level up: 3% Level up: 3% Level up: 3%
Activity: 71% Activity: 71% Activity: 71%
Re: Aickman's Philosophy

In fact, James and Robert, my posts were not intended to serve any particular agenda. The first was mostly for information - to make known Doug's work on 'Panacea', with some interesting tasters. The second was a call for nuance - Aickman's thinking is complex. I'd add that his literary practice is quite sly.

In my 'Haunted By Books', the first essay is ‘Studies of Strange Beauty – Robert Aickman, Philip Steegman & Arthington Worsley’. I mention here the ‘five facts’ rule: often only a handful of ‘facts’ survive about anyone. Look at them more closely and we may often find; (a) they are not facts, but impressions; (b) they are not necessarily representative; ( c ) – no surprise here – it’s usually more complicated than that.

I then look at two minor figures Aickman mentions in his autobiography. None of the facts Aickman gives about them is strictly untrue, but his portraits are very partial, and misleading. He has carved them for artistic effect. His quick sketches of them make great reading – that’s why I took the time to look at them closely. But they are really a sort of creative non-fiction. I infer from this that the picture Aickman gives us of himself may be no less partial.
Sand is offline   Reply With Quote
3 Thanks From:
miguel1984 (1 Week Ago), Robert Adam Gilmour (1 Week Ago), Speaking Mute (1 Week Ago)
Old 1 Week Ago   #82
Speaking Mute
Chymist
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 348
Quotes: 0
Points: 9,785, Level: 68 Points: 9,785, Level: 68 Points: 9,785, Level: 68
Level up: 45% Level up: 45% Level up: 45%
Activity: 57% Activity: 57% Activity: 57%
Re: Aickman's Philosophy

As I said in the Lovecraft/Butler thread, it's difficult for me to square Aickman being so conservative when he wrote novellas like The Late Breakfasters - with the exception of the (implicitly) closeted Mrs. Hatch, homosexuals are not only portrayed sympathetically but constitute the major protagonists, the Tories are mostly portrayed as shallow and hypocritical, the whole institution of marriage is skewered, and despite Griselda's gains and loses often being due to tricks of fate, she consciously takes risks to preserve her independence and does succeed in turning around the book store's business through her own acumen. The radical left of the era is reduced to gag-level Communist agitators, but there are ready parallels here between Aickman's sentiments and the current Anti-Corbyn and Anti-Sanders wings of Labour and the Democrats - whom, as much as I disagree with personally, are not anywhere close to actual conservatives in either country.

The only example of Aickman's rightward bias in his fiction I've seen mentioned is Growing Boys - and even though the husband is portrayed as
a narcissistic, avaricious party hack, I don't recall anything marking him as representative of Labour as a whole. On the other hand, it's difficult for me to see an isolated housewife being overwhelmed by monstrous children while her career obsessed husband remains willfully ignorant as providing for anything other than a feminist reading.

Now, since I know next to nothing about Aickman personally, I have no room to judge where he actually stood politically - but given that I would have guessed he was socially liberal and economically centrist (neither of which is incompatible with the anti-consumerism and anti-industrialization that is apparent in his fiction) his fiction doesn't need "sanitization" or political apologies.
Speaking Mute is offline   Reply With Quote
4 Thanks From:
Justin Isis (1 Week Ago), miguel1984 (1 Week Ago), Robert Adam Gilmour (1 Week Ago), Shadenuat (1 Week Ago)
Old 1 Week Ago   #83
Robert Adam Gilmour
Grimscribe
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 1,155
Quotes: 0
Points: 16,814, Level: 89 Points: 16,814, Level: 89 Points: 16,814, Level: 89
Level up: 62% Level up: 62% Level up: 62%
Activity: 99% Activity: 99% Activity: 99%
Re: Aickman's Philosophy

Quote Originally Posted by Hidden X View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Robert Adam Gilmour View Post
Hidden X and Durandal are really the same person
Really?
For one, if that was true, I wouldn't be posting here now. Moderators have acted pretty fast in such cases in the past (see WithStrenghtIBurn's legion of speedily banned alts), so my humble self certainly wouldn't be tolerated.
I'd prefer you left in the "If" at the start of my quote, because I never would have guessed it myself but that idea was thrown out there.

Strength's case is completely different. His different accounts were made one after another, after each was banned and you've never been banned as far as I know.

Robert Adam Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 Week Ago   #84
Shadenuat's Avatar
Shadenuat
Acolyte
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 80
Quotes: 0
Points: 770, Level: 15 Points: 770, Level: 15 Points: 770, Level: 15
Level up: 40% Level up: 40% Level up: 40%
Activity: 99% Activity: 99% Activity: 99%
Re: Aickman's Philosophy

Quote Originally Posted by Speaking Mute View Post
The only example of Aickman's rightward bias in his fiction I've seen mentioned is Growing Boys - and even though the husband is portrayed as
a narcissistic, avaricious party hack, I don't recall anything marking him as representative of Labour as a whole. On the other hand, it's difficult for me to see an isolated housewife being overwhelmed by monstrous children while her career obsessed husband remains willfully ignorant as providing for anything other than a feminist reading.
Same here. As I mentioned in that horror & far right thread, I could never have guessed that Aickman was conservative based on his fiction alone. That is one issue I had with some folks in that thread, because they claimed how his conservative biases are evident in his stories.
Nope, they most certainly aren't.
Now, IF I was introduced to some bits about his politics before reading any of his stories, I couldn't help but project some of it into his stories. I am not deceiving myself either about my flaws & limitations as a reader or about the way our minds work in general. But, in the same way, if someone has told me that he was pretty progressive in his politics, I would've also projected that in his stories and would think them (even more) liberal.
Shadenuat is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks From:
Speaking Mute (1 Week Ago)
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
aickman, philosophy

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Robert Aickman ElHI General Discussion 327 02-16-2017 05:23 AM
An Aickman Survival Calenture General Discussion 1 10-17-2015 04:39 AM
Robert Aickman. INTRUSIONS SGGosden Other News 2 11-13-2012 01:58 AM
How much did your Aickman's cost you? Julian Karswell General Discussion 72 07-10-2010 08:23 AM
Ligotti and Aickman nomis General Discussion 63 07-05-2009 04:40 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:37 AM.



Style Based on SONGS OF A DEAD DREAMER as Published by Silver Scarab Press
Design and Artwork by Harry Morris
Emulated in Hell by Dr. Bantham
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Template-Modifications by TMS