Recent Reading

Que alguien me diga: ¿debería comprar todo el material de Grimscribe o mejor la colección de entrevistas de Thomas Ligotti? Puede parecer un dilema sencillo para algunos, pero los libros en español son caros.
In my opinion, the ideal approach would be to read Grimscribe first to get a comprehensive view of Ligotti’s work, and then move on to his interviews. The interviews are magnificent and highly literary; in fact, I enjoyed many of them more than some of his short stories.
 
In my opinion, the ideal approach would be to read Grimscribe first to get a comprehensive view of Ligotti’s work, and then move on to his interviews. The interviews are magnificent and highly literary; in fact, I enjoyed many of them more than some of his short stories.
OK, OK.
Grimscribe it is, then. Thanks, Mersennus.
I'm sure it's a great anthology.
 
My humble reading list for June 2026:

Of Human Bondage – W. Somerset Maugham This was a good read that I may have never gotten around to if it weren’t for a friend. Maugham has an unusual style in that he does much telling but somehow, he makes it work. He’ll drop an insight into human nature that seems both original and self-evident. My favorite parts of the book were the three times Philip hit a crisis in his life and had a paradigm shift. One was when the art teacher in Paris gave him some straight talk (solicited by Philip) into the life of an artist and whether Philip had what it takes. Another was when Philip had run out of money and was homeless and hungry. Maugham’s understanding of how poverty operates on the human psyche was profound. The third was when Philip realized that there is no inherent meaning in life. And I really like Sarah.
Cold Mountain – Charles Frazier This was a read for class. I don’t think I’ve read a book this poetic and cosmic in a long time. The imagery was beautiful, and the spiritual reality of the main male character well handled. I also liked the two female characters, though I am convinced that Frazier felt out of his element with them, though he did try. And his description of Stobrod’s music was transcendent. The best part, though, is Frazier’s pacing. Everything develops so slowly that you think what you knew was going to happen won’t. And then it does.
Station Eleven – Emily St John Mandel This was another “homework” read (recommended by a friend). While I have some reservations about this book, the fact is that I was pulled into it. I liked the pacing in this book, too, in the way certain plot elements were revealed. This was partly due to the non-linear structure, with two different worlds and their relationship to each other (pre and post apocalypse). I also thought the role the comic books played in the belief systems of the stories helped make the plot more intricate, especially since Mandel showed restraint by not developing it too far.
All Hallow’s Eve – Charles Williams This was my second Williams book (an Inkling). I thought this was better than the other (War in Heaven) though that might be different if I were to read it again now, knowing what to expect. The best part of this book was Williams’ handling of the two separate Londons and how they interface. I would also say I liked that the ending was much less overblown than I’d feared, with an emphasis on the characters rather than on action. Reading this, and the ideas presented in it with his idiosyncratic syntax and style, I was convinced that Williams was not just taking them on as a literary device, but was a True Believer. These were ideas he’d spent his life developing. I’m glad I read this.
The Book of Laughter and Forgetting – Milan Kundera Kundera might be one of my more favorite writers. Thirty-five years ago I read everything he’d published so far, and while I did enjoy them, I decided I’d move on. I wasn’t (and I’m not) that interested in philosophy (there are no answers to those burning questions, even though they seemed so important in my youth). But somehow, I returned to him anyway, and I think the books are even better now. His style (like Maugham’s!) is about telling. But the beauty of it is that the books are always about something else beside the characters. And his personal philosophy is really a series of ruminations, and they generally take a form that is anything but orthodox. Now his style reminds me of Vonnegut in that way. And his characters can be terrible people, but just when I start to feel scandalized, Kundera turns them into absurd caricatures, and then I can see just how pathetic they are, in the sense that they inspire pathos. Life is inherently absurd.
 
My humble reading list for June 2026:

Of Human Bondage – W. Somerset Maugham This was a good read that I may have never gotten around to if it weren’t for a friend. Maugham has an unusual style in that he does much telling but somehow, he makes it work. He’ll drop an insight into human nature that seems both original and self-evident. My favorite parts of the book were the three times Philip hit a crisis in his life and had a paradigm shift. One was when the art teacher in Paris gave him some straight talk (solicited by Philip) into the life of an artist and whether Philip had what it takes. Another was when Philip had run out of money and was homeless and hungry. Maugham’s understanding of how poverty operates on the human psyche was profound. The third was when Philip realized that there is no inherent meaning in life. And I really like Sarah.
Cold Mountain – Charles Frazier This was a read for class. I don’t think I’ve read a book this poetic and cosmic in a long time. The imagery was beautiful, and the spiritual reality of the main male character well handled. I also liked the two female characters, though I am convinced that Frazier felt out of his element with them, though he did try. And his description of Stobrod’s music was transcendent. The best part, though, is Frazier’s pacing. Everything develops so slowly that you think what you knew was going to happen won’t. And then it does.
Station Eleven – Emily St John Mandel This was another “homework” read (recommended by a friend). While I have some reservations about this book, the fact is that I was pulled into it. I liked the pacing in this book, too, in the way certain plot elements were revealed. This was partly due to the non-linear structure, with two different worlds and their relationship to each other (pre and post apocalypse). I also thought the role the comic books played in the belief systems of the stories helped make the plot more intricate, especially since Mandel showed restraint by not developing it too far.
All Hallow’s Eve – Charles Williams This was my second Williams book (an Inkling). I thought this was better than the other (War in Heaven) though that might be different if I were to read it again now, knowing what to expect. The best part of this book was Williams’ handling of the two separate Londons and how they interface. I would also say I liked that the ending was much less overblown than I’d feared, with an emphasis on the characters rather than on action. Reading this, and the ideas presented in it with his idiosyncratic syntax and style, I was convinced that Williams was not just taking them on as a literary device, but was a True Believer. These were ideas he’d spent his life developing. I’m glad I read this.
The Book of Laughter and Forgetting – Milan Kundera Kundera might be one of my more favorite writers. Thirty-five years ago I read everything he’d published so far, and while I did enjoy them, I decided I’d move on. I wasn’t (and I’m not) that interested in philosophy (there are no answers to those burning questions, even though they seemed so important in my youth). But somehow, I returned to him anyway, and I think the books are even better now. His style (like Maugham’s!) is about telling. But the beauty of it is that the books are always about something else beside the characters. And his personal philosophy is really a series of ruminations, and they generally take a form that is anything but orthodox. Now his style reminds me of Vonnegut in that way. And his characters can be terrible people, but just when I start to feel scandalized, Kundera turns them into absurd caricatures, and then I can see just how pathetic they are, in the sense that they inspire pathos. Life is inherently absurd.
I find Kundera magnificent, but my memory of his work isn't very fresh, and since I've only read three of his novels, I still have a lot ahead of me. So I'll probably continue with The Joke, which strikes me as the most appealing based on its premise.
 
I find Kundera magnificent, but my memory of his work isn't very fresh, and since I've only read three of his novels, I still have a lot ahead of me. So I'll probably continue with The Joke, which strikes me as the most appealing based on its premise.
The Joke is seriously good. Maybe his best? I think he gets more postmodern as he goes, and the books get less and less like novels, though they do feature characters. Also, he doesn't really have that many...
 
I read the story that came after The Last Feast of the Harlequin—I can't remember its English title—and then I was about to start the third story in that section of Grimscribe when I noticed that The Night School was included in this anthology.

Up until then, all I knew about that story was a photo manipulation inspired by it, which disturbed me just as much as the story itself did once I finally decided to read it. It's an incredible piece. I didn't enjoy the second story from Grimscribe quite as much, though The Last Feast of the Harlequin is still my favorite so far. Even so, The Night School has that dissociative quality that drew me to Ligotti in the first place.

I'm not sure whether I should keep reading the stories at random or go through them in order. All I know is that I'll keep reading.
 
I read the story that came after The Last Feast of the Harlequin—I can't remember its English title—and then I was about to start the third story in that section of Grimscribe when I noticed that The Night School was included in this anthology.

Up until then, all I knew about that story was a photo manipulation inspired by it, which disturbed me just as much as the story itself did once I finally decided to read it. It's an incredible piece. I didn't enjoy the second story from Grimscribe quite as much, though The Last Feast of the Harlequin is still my favorite so far. Even so, The Night School has that dissociative quality that drew me to Ligotti in the first place.

I'm not sure whether I should keep reading the stories at random or go through them in order. All I know is that I'll keep reading.
Read Glamour next. It's a masterpiece. Then read The Mystics of Muelenburg.
 
I just finished reading both. The Glamour was good, but I liked The Night School more.
I love that one too, of course. That ending, with the darkness swallowing everything... And the prose is so poetic and diseased, especially when the narrator says that his remains will cover the sky. What's your interpretation of it?

The Glamour particularly appealed to me because of its dreamlike, nightmarish setting. It felt intensely hallucinatory. Another highly psychedelic story is In the Shadow of Another World. In an interview, Ligotti said that his favorite story he had written was The Shadow at the Bottom of the World, the final story in Grimscribe.
 
In Teatro Grottesco there are a few stories that fell somewhat flat for me. In Grimscribe I think only “Spectacles in the Drawer” produced a similar result.
I didn't care much for The Spectacles in the Drawer either. It had a good idea, but it felt a bit lukewarm. Neither particularly good nor bad. I felt the same way about Purity. I did, however, really love The Bungalow House and Gas Station Carnivals from Teatro Grottesco.
 
I just finished reading "In the Shadow of Another World," and I absolutely loved it. The mere fact that it includes AOS was enough to win me over. I only have a few stories from Grimscribe left. I've been reading them in a pretty random order, but I'm saving the last one—for lack of a better way to put it—for the very end.
 
Erle Stanley Gardner

Gardner, Erle Stanley - The Knife Slipped

Early Cool & Lam, refused by the publisher in 1939 for sex and corruption.
Certainly relevant and worth a read in today’s world.
The case is relatively simple for new operative Lam. Cheating husband.
Wife is a weepy blubberer, her mother a forceful battle ax.
Still, she is no match for Bertha Cool, a towering force in this.
The adultery soon goes into bribery, murder, politics.
Juicy narrative spills like an offspring of Pre Code and Noir.

Excerpt to indicate just how different 1939 was from today:

“… People are suckers, Donald. God made them suckers. Politicians lead them around by a ring through the nose. Occasionally some reformer comes along and beats the cymbals and blows the trumpet – and that’s all the good it does…”
I said hotly, “That’s not the same thing. Essentially, people are honest. They –”
“Sure, they’re honest,” Bertha Cool interrupted, “but they’re lazy, and they’re mentally inefficient. They like to be hypnotized. They love to be fooled, and they’re suckers for sale psychology. Look what happens, lover. We have graft today. A hundred years ago we had graft. We probably have more today than we did a hundred years ago…”


Sad to say, this passage only worsens, with scurrilous comments on politicians, Presidents, even. Not today, we live in the Age of Aquarius. Right on.

A romp of a read.
 
I just finished reading "In the Shadow of Another World," and I absolutely loved it. The mere fact that it includes AOS was enough to win me over. I only have a few stories from Grimscribe left. I've been reading them in a pretty random order, but I'm saving the last one—for lack of a better way to put it—for the very end.
That story reminded me a lot of The Colour Out of Space. It's very psychedelic. The two stories in Grimscribe that I didn't like were "Miss Plarr" and "The Library of Byzantium."
 
Those are the two I have left, along with the final one. Three stories I want to read today.
"The Library of Byzantium" starts well and has a good concept, but it becomes slow and almost soporific about halfway through. As for "Miss Plarr," I've reread it several times, but it still strikes me as minor, early Ligotti. You did the right thing by leaving them until the end. If you had started with those two, I think you would have come away with a rather weak impression of Grimscribe.
 
Back
Top