THE NIGHTMARE NETWORK
Go Back   THE NIGHTMARE NETWORK > Discussion & Interpretation > Thomas Ligotti
Home Forums Content Contagion Members Media Diversion Info Register
Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes Translate
Old 07-12-2017   #1
Justin Isis's Avatar
Justin Isis
Grimscribe
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 557
Quotes: 0
Points: 29,163, Level: 100 Points: 29,163, Level: 100 Points: 29,163, Level: 100
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

An issue that's been preoccupying me for some time. We know that Ligotti is at least conversant with the discourses surrounding complex systems of oppression but there are not many statements by him where he talks about being agitated by other people's feminism not being intersectional enough. It would be nice to know he is at least occasionally irked or nettled by the lack of a genre-wide intersectional awareness.
Justin Isis is offline   Reply With Quote
7 Thanks From:
cannibal cop (07-12-2017), Gnosticangel (03-24-2018), gveranon (07-12-2017), Jeff Coleman (07-28-2017), miguel1984 (07-12-2017), Nirvana In Karma (07-12-2017), The Chairmaker (08-16-2017)
Old 07-12-2017   #2
Nirvana In Karma
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quotes:
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

Can't have patriarchial systems of oppression if there's nobody alive to oppress anything.

  Reply With Quote
6 Thanks From:
gveranon (07-12-2017), Jeff Coleman (07-28-2017), Justin Isis (07-12-2017), miguel1984 (07-12-2017), qcrisp (03-25-2018), The Chairmaker (08-16-2017)
Old 07-12-2017   #3
Justin Isis's Avatar
Justin Isis
Grimscribe
Threadstarter
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 557
Quotes: 0
Points: 29,163, Level: 100 Points: 29,163, Level: 100 Points: 29,163, Level: 100
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

Some relevant stories:

"Purity"
"The Bungalow House"
"Miss Plarr"
Justin Isis is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Thanks From:
gveranon (07-12-2017), miguel1984 (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017   #4
Nirvana In Karma
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quotes:
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

Now that you mention "Purity", Justin, I suppose Candy's addiction to mayonaise-drenched weiners is symbolic of the male dominance over a woman's body.

Not too sure about "The Bungalow House", but it's been some time since I've read that one.
  Reply With Quote
4 Thanks From:
gveranon (07-12-2017), Jeff Coleman (07-28-2017), Justin Isis (07-12-2017), miguel1984 (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017   #5
Ascrobius's Avatar
Ascrobius
Our Temporary Supervisor
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 762
Quotes: 0
Points: 31,273, Level: 100 Points: 31,273, Level: 100 Points: 31,273, Level: 100
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?



Joking...

I tell you everything that is really nothing, and nothing of what is everything, do not be fooled by what I am saying. Please listen carefully and try to hear what I am not saying. ~Charles C. Finn
Ascrobius is offline   Reply With Quote
7 Thanks From:
Druidic (07-12-2017), GirlyGirlMask (03-26-2018), gveranon (07-12-2017), Hecatombs For Hecate (03-28-2018), Justin Isis (07-12-2017), Kevin (07-12-2017), miguel1984 (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017   #6
gveranon's Avatar
gveranon
Grimscribe
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 1,307
Quotes: 0
Points: 43,580, Level: 100 Points: 43,580, Level: 100 Points: 43,580, Level: 100
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 0% Activity: 0% Activity: 0%
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

From My Work Is Not Yet Done:

Quote
I declared earlier in this document that, "with one exception," there was no cuteness among The Seven. Sherry was the exception, although a serious qualification must be appended to this statement. Physically she was attractive, not to the point of being a harrowing beauty, but enough to put her over the line between women of average or even "good" looks into the company of those who possessed across-the-room attraction. (If anyone believes that I'm perpetuating some arbitrary or twisted image of the world, that's fine with me--I wish them well in their transactions with social reality.)


To those who would, more in anger than in sorrow, instantly declare this problematic, I wish to point out that Ligotti's reference to "social reality" would seem to raise this passage from problematicity to critique. However, the wording here--"I wish them well in their transactions with social reality"--would seem to ironize this critical awareness at the expense of the critiquer. And since irony is, if not inherently reactionary, at least suspect (in that righteous indignation requires unself-aware univocity of cognizance), this passage is problematic after all.

Continuing the passage:

Quote
The qualification to which I made reference above is this: if you happened to cross that room on the other side of which stood Sherry, what you confronted was... [ellipsis in original] I can't even name it--some kind of thing inhabiting the body of an attractive woman, an alien from some diseased planet or a creature of low evolutionary stature that by some curious means had insinuated itself into a human being at some stage in her development, the result being this Sherry-thing.
Now that is intersectional as all get-out! Perhaps Haraway would find it old hat, but leaving aside Harawayan modalities (if I may be pardoned for further marginalizing the marginal), Ligotti here is, I contend, beyond 2017 in his awareness of intersectionality. The Sherry-thing... some kind of thing inhabiting the body of an attractive woman... an alien... a creature. If only that didn't sound so misogynistic! But relax: it turns out that the swinish darkness inhabits all beings. Question for intersectional theorists: Given that the swinish darkness inhabits all beings, how is this swinish darkness inflected in socially-constructed identities of the oppressed? And isn't whiteness uniquely implicated in darkness? (The chromaticity of this image becomes problematic.)
gveranon is offline   Reply With Quote
6 Thanks From:
Acutely decayed (07-14-2017), Druidic (07-12-2017), Jeff Coleman (07-28-2017), Justin Isis (07-12-2017), miguel1984 (07-12-2017), qcrisp (03-25-2018)
Old 07-12-2017   #7
Arthur Staaz's Avatar
Arthur Staaz
Mystic
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 196
Quotes: 0
Points: 19,953, Level: 97 Points: 19,953, Level: 97 Points: 19,953, Level: 97
Level up: 64% Level up: 64% Level up: 64%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

I see the potential for a great article in a leading humanities journal. Othering, of course, would need to be addressed.

Heaven and Earth are not humane.
They regard all things as straw dogs.
The sage is not humane.
He regards all people as straw dogs.
Arthur Staaz is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Thanks From:
gveranon (07-12-2017), miguel1984 (07-12-2017)
Old 07-12-2017   #8
cannibal cop's Avatar
cannibal cop
Grimscribe
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 597
Quotes: 0
Points: 12,642, Level: 77 Points: 12,642, Level: 77 Points: 12,642, Level: 77
Level up: 70% Level up: 70% Level up: 70%
Activity: 25% Activity: 25% Activity: 25%
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

All I want is to see the churning, all-pervading darkness PUNCHING UP a little more often. Is that really too much to ask?

Who provideth for the raven his food?
cannibal cop is offline   Reply With Quote
2 Thanks From:
gveranon (07-12-2017), spore (05-15-2022)
Old 07-12-2017   #9
Robert Adam Gilmour
Grimscribe
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 2,541
Quotes: 0
Points: 63,822, Level: 100 Points: 63,822, Level: 100 Points: 63,822, Level: 100
Level up: 0% Level up: 0% Level up: 0%
Activity: 50% Activity: 50% Activity: 50%
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

Quote Originally Posted by gveranon View Post
intersectional as all get-out!
New book title

Robert Adam Gilmour is offline   Reply With Quote
Thanks From:
gveranon (07-12-2017)
Old 03-24-2018   #10
Sad Marsh Ghost
Guest
Posts: n/a
Quotes:
Re: Is Ligotti's feminism intersectional enough for 2017 relevance?

How did I miss this thread?

Intersectionality is great and why third-wave feminism is really pretty cool. I have no idea what Ligotti's views on intersectionality are. I know he's a socialist, but not all are intersectional. I think that despite the general lack of what could be considered 'diverse representation', his work's picture of antinatalism as a form of compassion is compatible with intersectionality. There are a lot of antinatalist feminists as it's actually a good way of removing reactionary society's view of women as baby factories.
  Reply With Quote
2 Thanks From:
miguel1984 (03-25-2018), ToALonelyPeace (03-25-2018)
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
2017, feminism, intersectional, ligotti, relevance


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
John Elliott (1938 - 2017) qcrisp General Discussion 5 06-20-2019 10:15 AM
Ligotti panel at NecronomiCon Providence 2017 Sam Ligotti News 106 09-21-2017 07:47 AM
Primal Screen (2017) schlieu Ligottian Films 0 09-13-2017 11:53 PM
The Handmaid's Tale (2017 TV Series) Shadenuat Television 39 05-21-2017 03:51 AM
Engaging Topic Of The Month May, 2017 TLO Engaging Topic of the Month 1 05-07-2017 12:59 AM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:29 PM.



Style Based on SONGS OF A DEAD DREAMER as Published by Silver Scarab Press
Design and Artwork by Harry Morris
Emulated in Hell by Dr. Bantham
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Template-Modifications by TMS